Which of the following is NOT a method for evaluating teacher effectiveness?

Evaluating teacher effectiveness is a critical component of educational leadership, and it typically involves methods that directly assess a teacher's performance and impact on student learning. Selecting curriculum design as the answer shows an understanding that this method does not directly evaluate the effectiveness of a teacher in the classroom setting.

Classroom observations are a common and direct method for assessing how teachers engage with students, manage their classrooms, and deliver content. Observers can evaluate teaching techniques, classroom dynamics, and instructional strategies, all of which are crucial indicators of teacher effectiveness.

Student assessments serve as another primary evaluation tool. They provide tangible data on student learning and outcomes, reflecting the effectiveness of teacher instruction. By analyzing student performance on tests and other assessments, administrators can gauge how well a teacher's methods are translating into student understanding and achievement.

Peer evaluations are also frequently used as they involve feedback from other educators who can offer valuable insights into teaching practices. Peer evaluators often observe lessons and can share perspectives on strengths and areas for improvement, fostering professional growth.

In contrast, while curriculum design is essential for effective teaching and learning, it focuses on the content and structure of what is being taught rather than on the individual effectiveness of the teachers delivering that curriculum. Thus, it does not fulfill the role of evaluating